Sent from my iPhone
> On 18 feb. 2014, at 20:09, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > > I don't understand why it's a blocker for release. > > 1. There is no correlated BUG ID. There was a bug id, it was closed as it was resolved and committed to the 4.3-forward tree. > 2. Unit test is good, but unit test is not a blocker for release > 3. If what's missing is only a check for input value, I don't think it's a > blocker. It means that with this RC users can't use the Nicira gateway. It will throw an error when the network transitions from allocated to implemented. Cheers, Hugo > > --Sheng > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Daan >> >> Sorry I missed it. what is the impact of not including the fix? Is it >> really a blocker? >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=d38a50343130f6f147e2c9c7b2e32a43f31c7e6b >> >> >> Thanks >> Animesh >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:26 AM >>> To: dev >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) >>> >>> -1 (binding) >>> >>> tested vlan based standalone network >>> tested vlan based bridged network >>> tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with >> nicira >>> based gateway and - tier network >>> >>> All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from >> the >>> instance. >>> >>> All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan >> based tests >>> didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with >> no ip >>> and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged, >>> >>> For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and >>> recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not >> yet point >>> to a bug that causes this. >>> >>> My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch >>> wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed >> it >>> would be included due to [2]. >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 >>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk >>> >>> kind regards, >>> Daan Hoogland >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri >>> <srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought >> one up >>> and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in >> the >>> next run. >>>> >>>> So, it is a +1 from my side >>>> >>>> Sent from HTC >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Reply message ----- >>>> From: "Geoff Higginbottom" <geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> >>>> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) >>>> Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: >>>> >>>> I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re- >>> create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the >> existing >>> range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all >> on the >>> latest RC (fifth round). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Geoff Higginbottom >>>> >>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 >>>> >>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Srikanteswararao Talluri >>>> [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] >>>> Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29 >>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) >>>> >>>> There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from >>>> previous RC. Created a bug for this >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131 >>>> >>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-m >>>> atrix >>>> -4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke.tes >>>> t_gue >>>> >>> st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRange/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193 >>>> -------- >>>> 4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are >> not >>> supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more intermittent test script/env issue >>> related to ssh. >>>> 1 failure related to dedicated guest VLAN range looks like a bug >>>> ------- >>>> Link to reports: >>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1193/testRepo >>>> rt/ >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> Total:98 >>>> Fail :10 >>>> Skip :2 >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> name pass fail skip >>>> test_loadbalance/ 0 4 0 >>>> test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 0 >>>> test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0 >>>> test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_scale_vm/ 0 1 0 >>>> test_ssvm/ 10 0 0 >>>> test_network/ 7 0 0 >>>> test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0 >>>> test_volumes/ 9 0 0 >>>> test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_routers/ 9 0 0 >>>> test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_network_acl/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 >>>> test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_nic/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_iso/ 5 0 1 >>>> test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0 >>>> test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_regions/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_templates/ 7 0 1 >>>> test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_vm_snapshots/ 0 3 0 >>>> test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_pvlan/ 1 0 0 >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> >>>> On XenServer6.2/Test Run: #1194 >>>> -------- >>>> 5 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh and >>>> 1 failure in dedicated guest vlan range looks like a bug >>>> ------- >>>> Link to reports: >>>> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1194/testRepo >>>> rt/ >>>> >>>> -------- >>>> Total:98 >>>> Fail :6 >>>> Skip :2 >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> name pass fail skip >>>> test_loadbalance/ 3 0 0 >>>> test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 0 >>>> test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0 >>>> test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_scale_vm/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_ssvm/ 10 0 0 >>>> test_network/ 7 0 0 >>>> test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0 >>>> test_volumes/ 9 0 0 >>>> test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_routers/ 9 0 0 >>>> test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_network_acl/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 >>>> test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_nic/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_iso/ 5 0 1 >>>> test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0 >>>> test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_regions/ 1 0 0 >>>> test_templates/ 7 0 1 >>>> test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_vm_snapshots/ 0 4 0 >>>> test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0 >>>> test_pvlan/ 1 0 0 >>>> -------- >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> ~Talluri >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17/02/14 10:57 am, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >>>> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (binding) verified release artifacts, tested with devcloud. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Animesh >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" >>>>> <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a >>>>>> >>>>>> vote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a >>>>>> few times, I would like to close out this VOTE little sooner by >>>>>> Tuesday morning PST. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h >>>>>> = >>>>>> ref >>>>>> s/heads/4.3 >>>>>> Commit: adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> List of changes: >>>>>> >>>>>> New Features in 4.3: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 >>>>>> >>>>>> Improvement in 4.3: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 >>>>>> >>>>>> Issues fixed in 4.3 >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 >>>>>> >>>>>> Known Issues in 4.3: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>>>>> >>>>>> location): >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Testing instructions are here: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+ >>> p >>>>>> r >>>>>> oce >>>>>> dure >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Tuesday morning PST) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>>>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? >>>> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack- >>> infrastructure-support/> offers the best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack >>> Environments. >>>> >>>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses >>>> >>>> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 >>>> training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. >>>> Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, >>>> On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >>>> >>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >> intended >>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views >> or >>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily >>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not >> the >>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based >>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the >> sender >>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a >>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is >> a >>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape >>> Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in >>> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a >>> registered trademark. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>
