Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late. On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote:
>I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it >shouldn¹t be a surprise. > >But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the >ML i see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of >the trouble with master. Just make sure it hits both master and the 4.4 >branch. I¹ll even happily do it for you if you point me to the branch >that needs to be merged into 4.4. Just make sure its rebased up to commit >id 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db and not further. > >Cheers, > >Hugo > >On 14 mrt. 2014, at 15:56, Abhinandan Prateek ><abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the >> master and commit there features. >> -1 for the timing to cut the branch ! >> >> On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "Murali Reddy" <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>> On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" <h...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Repository: cloudstack >>>> Updated Branches: >>>> refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d >>>> >>> >>> Hugo, >>> >>> I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see >>> that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready >>>to >>> be checked-in and then cut a branch? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Murali >>> >> >