Thanks Hugo ! Saw your reply bit late.

On 14/03/14 8:34 pm, "Hugo Trippaers" <h...@trippaers.nl> wrote:

>I announced the time when i would cut the branch in advance, so it
>shouldn¹t be a surprise.
>
>But like i replied to Muralli, if you have a pending merge request on the
>ML i see no problem with merging it in in the next few hours because of
>the trouble with master. Just make sure it hits both master and the 4.4
>branch. I¹ll even happily do it for you if you point me to the branch
>that needs to be merged into 4.4. Just make sure its rebased up to commit
>id 48f8a95b06b0348ba1349cb5434183c2c18710db and not further.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Hugo
>
>On 14 mrt. 2014, at 15:56, Abhinandan Prateek
><abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I think we could have checked with people struggling to fix the
>> master and commit there features.
>> -1 for the timing to cut the branch !
>> 
>> On 14/03/14 8:19 pm, "Murali Reddy" <murali.re...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 14/03/14 7:09 PM, "h...@apache.org" <h...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Repository: cloudstack
>>>> Updated Branches:
>>>> refs/heads/4.4 [created] 3ee1fc28d
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hugo,
>>> 
>>> I was holding off merge to master, as it seems to be broken now. I see
>>> that you already created 4.4 branch. Can we wait till master is ready
>>>to
>>> be checked-in and then cut a branch?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Murali
>>> 
>> 
>

Reply via email to