On 19.03.2014 22:28, Edison Su wrote:
Edison, if - with the workarounds in place now - the current version
of KVM
works OK, then why wouldn't a newer version work just as fine?
Just trying to understand this.
That's a long story, there is a bug in Libvirt, which is introduced
in a newer version(>0.9.10), which can make the storage pool
disappear.
Edison, that I understand, but what is the technical reason that
prevents using newer KVM?
It looks like current KVM works fine on CentOS 6.5 for example which
has libvirt 0.10.2.
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
