Does "storage.overprovisioning.factor" Global setting is set to 1?
Pierre-Luc Dion Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 - - - *CloudOps*420 rue Guy Montréal QC H3J 1S6 www.cloudops.com @CloudOps_ On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Gaurav Aradhye <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>wrote: > I used those numbers just for example. Here I am not creating template from > Snapshot, I am registering through URL and then downloading it. Even in 2 > GB case, it will exceed the limit if I set the limit as 5 GB. Here I am > able to register 3 templates and get the total count as 6 GB which exceeds > the limit. > > Regards, > Gaurav > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> > wrote: > > > Does the templates really use 10GB? because if you create a template from > > an Instance that have 10GB disk offering, the template might only consume > > 2GB on the secondary storage which is the used space of the virtual disk. > > > > > > Pierre-Luc Dion > > Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect > > 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101 > > - - - > > > > *CloudOps*420 rue Guy > > Montréal QC H3J 1S6 > > www.cloudops.com > > @CloudOps_ > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Gaurav Aradhye > > <gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I came across this scenario where secondary storage limit of the domain > > > gets exceeded. > > > > > > Suppose we have set secondary storage limit for a domain as 20 GB and > we > > > register 2 templates of 10 GB each in the domain. Now as already the > > limit > > > is reached, new template won't be registered. > > > > > > But suppose we register 2 templates of 9 GB each, then 2 GBs are left > > > available. But now if I register and download a template of 10 GB, then > > > still it will be successful although it exceeds the limit. > > > > > > This might be happening because it won't know the size of the template > > > while registering it. But at least then the download operation should > > fail. > > > > > > Is this correct behaviour? If not, I will log a bug for this. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Gaurav > > > > > >
