Quite right:
- Feasibility experiment plans by Schuberg Philis - Reusable work by Karl - Problems Citrix encountered with the regular redundant router (and how to avoid them) - Work division - (next meeting needed?) Any additions? \DaanH From: Sheng Yang [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39 To: Sander Botman Cc: Daan Hoogland; Karl Harris; dev; Alena Prokharchyk; [email protected]; Christopher Litsinger; Hugo Trippaers; int-toolkit Subject: Re: redundant virtual routers for VPCs BTW, do we have an agenda or some topics we want to discuss for the meeting? I just want to make sure it's efficient. --Sheng On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Sander Botman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all I can make 15:00. Cannon join at 20:00. Cheers Sander Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 9 jun. 2014 om 21:31 heeft "Daan Hoogland" > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende > geschreven: > > nice, > > so given pacific time I can have a meeting at 15:00 utc or at 20:00 > utc (8 am or 2 pm if I'm correct). Given office hours in Holland 17:00 > (15:00 utc) would be best but if you're not in it could be later. As > the person calling the meeting I would like to participate but if the > highest attendance can be found only between 16 and 22 utc thats fine > as well. > >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Karl Harris >> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> I will be happy to join! >> >> >> >>> On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant >>> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from >>> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources >>> for it. Withing our dev group we are now planning a sprint to >>> experiment with this subject and then implement or fix the present >>> routers to support this. However we would very much like input from >>> the people who have already worked on this and are also very willing >>> to let them in our sprint-team if they are willing. >>> >>> So: who want to join in a irc meeting (or conf call) on the subject >>> coming week? Dutch people are not in the office on the day after >>> ascension so tuesday is our intention. >>> >>> on behalf of some very impatient operators;) >>> -- >>> Daan > > > > -- > Daan
