The question put in line with actuality: is the rc I just baked ready for consumption? it contains a fixed up version to deal with Ove's issue with the last RC.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Stephen Turner <stephen.tur...@citrix.com> wrote: > This is just the xapi SDK we're talking about, isn't it? Which is BSD > licensed. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com] > Sent: 16 July 2014 14:39 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: xapi jar as separate release > > Curious if XAPI being LGPL2 matters for this discussion. > > http://www.xenproject.org/developers/teams/xapi.html > > -tim > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Mike Tutkowski < > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > >> Doh! I mixed up master (4.5) with 4.4 in my e-mail. My mistake. I >> understand your question now, Daan. >> >> On Wednesday, July 16, 2014, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hey, I missed this mail. Should I have picked something into 4.4 >> > before calling a vote? >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Mike Tutkowski >> > <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > That's exactly what I was wondering, Alex. :) >> > > >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Alex Huang <alex.hu...@citrix.com >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > >> I checked into master the changes that remove our copy and just >> > >> use >> the >> > >> copy the XenServer team checked into maven. Is there any reason >> > >> we're talking about this? >> > >> >> > >> --Alex >> > >> >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > >> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us <javascript:;>] >> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 1:40 AM >> > >> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> >> > >> > Subject: Re: xapi jar as separate release >> > >> > >> > >> > XAPI is not an apache project. I do not believe that we can >> > >> > sanely >> > make a >> > >> > separate release. Compared to bundling it with our release as >> > >> > we We >> > have >> > >> > essentially 'forked' XAPI from the upstream at Xen Project and >> > >> > made >> > our >> > >> > own changes. Those changes are in the latest version AIUI, but >> > >> > not >> the >> > >> > version that we are currently using. >> > >> > >> > >> > --David >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Daan Hoogland < >> > daan.hoogl...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > LS, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > One of the issues with the last RC was that the cloudstack >> > >> > > xapi >> was >> > >> > > not a released version (i.e. 6.2.0-1-SNAPSHOT). In the >> > >> > > release >> build >> > >> > > it was numbered as 6.2.0-1 but not referred by that release >> > >> > > number >> > but >> > >> > > by the snapshot id. There are several solutions to this. The >> > >> > > most correct would seem to be to release the xapi module >> > >> > > separately and create a release for it. I know that there has >> > >> > > been some shifting >> > back >> > >> > > and forth with this module and I would like to get consensus >> > >> > > to >> > create >> > >> > > a separate module and release for it. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > So my question: How do I get a version into the maven repo? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > thanks, >> > >> > > -- >> > >> > > Daan >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *Mike Tutkowski* >> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;> >> > > o: 303.746.7302 >> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> > > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Daan >> > >> >> >> -- >> *Mike Tutkowski* >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com >> o: 303.746.7302 >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* >> -- Daan
