For a proposal which got all +1’s[1] what are the next steps to do?? It was made clear on the voting thread that required branching changes would be done if the vote passes[2]
Though the content in the document changed, the original proposal hasn’t changed. Its still the same. It is explained in details with all the commands and more details in the wiki. Hence there is quite a bit of text changes. It is not a diversion from what is already discussed. [1] http://markmail.org/message/h7nh6ozseien7ezh [2] http://markmail.org/message/u7k6wv5kslb4ysyn ~Rajani On 06-Aug-2014, at 12:56 am, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us<mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote: On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com<mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com>> wrote: I think we should hold on with the git workflow implementation till all the decisions on the items written by Leo, are discussed and finalized. The very beginning of ³git workflow vote² shows that the vote was just to get people opinion on the proposal. Before adopting it and cutting the develop branch, all the questions should be cleared out. I agree with Alena - the vote was framed as opinion, not adoption. Moreover, the document voted on has been changed ~10 times since we started the vote, and the differences are substantial: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/diffpagesbyversion.action?pageId=30738915&selectedPageVersions=32&selectedPageVersions=22 Agreement to do something and the following implementation are not necessarily instantaneous.
