----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25097/#review51984 -----------------------------------------------------------
test/integration/component/test_advancedsg_networks.py <https://reviews.apache.org/r/25097/#comment90696> Please add addtional check to make sure deployed vm is actually getting ip from additional subnet range or not. get ip from current deployed vm and check this ip is with in new subnet ip range list or not. or Also before calling virtualmachine.create(for vm2) ,check the current ip range is full. Use listCapcity API with type =8 as paraameter to cross check the Ip capacity check - suresh sadhu On Aug. 27, 2014, 1:14 p.m., sanjeev n wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/25097/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 27, 2014, 1:14 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack, suresh sadhu, Santhosh Edukulla, and > SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > Test script to verify vm deployment with two networks in SG enabled advanced > zone. > Involves following steps: > 1.Deploy SG enabled advanced zone with only 4 ip addresses in guest ip range > using simulator > 2.Deploy one guest vm in the default shared guest network so that all the IP > addresses will be consumed > 3.Add another guest network in the zone created at step1 > 4.Deploy vm without passing the network id. It should pick the network with > sufficient resources > > > Diffs > ----- > > test/integration/component/test_advancedsg_networks.py 85ab697 > tools/marvin/marvin/config/test_data.cfg 5a3d8aa > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25097/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > @Desc: VM Cannot deploy to second network in advanced SG network ... === > TestName: test_34_DeployVM_in_SecondSGNetwork | Status : SUCCESS === > ok > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 1 test in 357.750s > > OK > > > Thanks, > > sanjeev n > >
