Rohit, If I understood you correctly, the user_id column is only used for
listing resources to indicate which user is the real owner/creator of the
resource, but you don't want to change CloudStack account-level permission
model to user-level permission model, right? If so, the change will be
smaller, maybe some Response classes, which should not involve too many
business layer change. I will hesitate to really change CloudStack IAM
model though.

Thanks
-min

On 11/14/14 10:35 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

>Hi Min,
>
>Good to know. What do you propose we do moving forward. Do a refactoring
>run to fix it or leave it as it is and perhaps add user_id columns to few
>resources that are more useful for sysadmins such as vm_instance table.
>
>> On 14-Nov-2014, at 11:49 pm, Min Chen <min.c...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>> Rohit,
>>
>> I think that the historic reason for this is that CloudStack is only
>> doing IAM access permission check on account level, user is only login
>> authentication purpose. That is why we will see that all our CloudStack
>> resource owner field is an account, since that is the only information
>> used for controlling whether you have some permissions to the resource.
>> Thanks
>> -min
>>
>> On 11/14/14 12:53 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> All CloudStack DB entities (VM, storage, network etc.) have an owner
>>> field which is mostly the account. An account can have multiple users
>>>so
>>> just by looking at the resource (say VM) it¹s not possible to make out
>>> which user in the account (owner or account_id field in the db row of
>>>the
>>> entity) created it. CloudStack users may want to know this information
>>> for at least entities such as VMs and Volumes.
>>>
>>> Historically, why is the account owner of an entity and not a user? If
>>> user were the owner, we could easily get the account Id using the user
>>>Id.
>>>
>>> One solution to fix this problem is to refactor and replace Account
>>> (interface) usage with UserAccount (interface) usage, fix the DAO and
>>> resource layer, and add columns in the schema. This gets us all the
>>> information we need to determine domainId, AccountId and Id (the user
>>> ID). Should we do it for all entities or just keep status quo (use
>>> account as owners), or just fix it on-demand basis for specific
>>>entities
>>> such as for user VMs [1].
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7908
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Rohit Yadav
>>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>>> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>>>services
>>>
>>> IaaS Cloud Design &
>>> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>>> CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment
>>>framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>>> CloudStack Software
>>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>>> CloudStack Infrastructure
>>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
>>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>>
>>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>>intended
>>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>>> or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>>> necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
>>> you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
>>> any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
>>>Please
>>> contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in
>>>error.
>>> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>>> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
>>> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda
>>>is
>>> a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from
>>>Shape
>>> Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic
>>>of
>>> South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
>>> is a registered trademark.
>>
>
>Regards,
>Rohit Yadav
>Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
>
>
>Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>
>IaaS Cloud Design &
>Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>CloudStack Software
>Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>CloudStack Infrastructure
>Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>CloudStack Bootcamp Training
>Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
>you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
>any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
>contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
>under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is
>a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape
>Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of
>South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue
>is a registered trademark.

Reply via email to