----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18480/#review63332 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! I guest we can close this one? - Pierre-Luc Dion On Feb. 25, 2014, 7:18 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/18480/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 25, 2014, 7:18 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6170 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6170 > > > Repository: cloudstack-git > > > Description > ------- > > Cloud environments have a need for guaranteed storage performance. By this I > mean having the ability to specify a minimum and maximum number of IOPS on a > volume-by-volume basis. > > I added support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.2 for data disks. > > I added support for this for KVM in 4.3 for data disks. > > It is my intent to add support for this for XenServer and ESX in 4.4 for root > disks (with subsequent support for root disks on KVM expected in 4.5). > > The main changes are expected to occur in CloudStack logic that controls > hypervisors and additions to the way root-volume orchestration happens. > > This will also require minor changes in the SolidFire (storage) plug-in. > > > Diffs > ----- > > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18480/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Mike Tutkowski > >
