+1, it makes sense for cloudmonkey :) On 9 December 2014 at 22:51, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 , I wish we could make such a call on the stack. > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM, sebgoa <run...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Dec 9, 2014, at 2:25 PM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master > >> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if > >> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch > >> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work > >> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to > >> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the > >> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc. > >> > >> This way we will have: > >> - one main working branch (master) > >> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull > >> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers > >> - master is aimed to remain stable > >> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks) > >> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward > >> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades > >> > >> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions; > >> > >> +1 approve > >> +0 no opinion > >> -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > > > > +1 > > > > that's what we do in libcloud. > > > > You could have a situation where you want to release a minor, and have > to build it in a release branch. Cherry picking from master. > > > > But the next major already will have all the cherry picks from the > previous minor. > > > > so +1 for linear and rolling upgrade. > > > > > >> Regards, > >> Rohit Yadav > >> Software Architect, ShapeBlue > >> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > >> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :) > >> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related > services > >> > >> IaaS Cloud Design & Build< > http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > >> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ > > > >> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > >> CloudStack Software Engineering< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > >> CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > >> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > >> > >> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any > views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you > are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any > action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please > contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. > Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue > Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under > license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a > company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape > Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of > South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is > a registered trademark. > > > > > > -- > Daan >
