actually Stephen, the issue is for committers that work on security or other urgent patches as gerrit wants to be sole owner of the repo. This is fine once we are at a more advanced level in our ci/cd process but not for now.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Stephen Turner <stephen.tur...@citrix.com> wrote: > Thanks for the minutes, Pierre-Luc. I think you're right that gerrit was > considered to be good on quality but hard to maintain; but also I think we > said that the "hospitality" would be a problem for non-committers. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pdion...@apache.org] > Sent: 21 January 2015 18:16 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Quality improvement process today > > Quick resume of 2014-01-21 call on GoToMeeting: > > - it was not recorded > - all notes are on: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Gate+implementation+plan > > > 1. Peer review for pull request, merge request or patches is not viable > because it require too much effort from the community. > 2. github pull request is the easiest way to contribute, so David will setup > trigger on github to launch CI against PR using jenkins plugin: pull request > builder 3. gated commit using gerrit might be highly complex to put in place, > but highly fit in the hospitality and quality principles 4. need to move > jenkins.bac,o into Apache infra > > > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> be present too. >> >> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:41 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> >>> I'll be present. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Daan Hoogland >>> <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Is anybody planning to be online for a meeting on any medium? >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Daan >>> >> >> -- Daan
