I'm not voting yet, but I did have an issue with CentOS7. Not sure if
we were intending to release 4.5 support for it.

2015-02-09 11:28:07,112 ERROR [c.c.u.d.Merovingian2]
(localhost-startStop-1:null) Unable to get a new db connection

java.sql.SQLException: No suitable driver found for
jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/cloud?autoReconnect=true&prepStmtCacheSize=517&cachePrepStmts=true

mysql-connector-java is installed.


On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Did perform lot of tests against RC3, did upgrade from 4.4.2 to 4.5-RC4, no
> issues so far.
>
> If this RC pass the vote, can we do the GA from with a different commit ID
> to include the license header flagged by Chip ?
>
>
> PL
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This looks like a config issue "host sent incorrect data center".
>>
>> From your subsequent emails, my guess is that this host was once added
>>  to another zone '3' in your test environment, then re-added to the
>> zone '5' without being explicitly removed from the zone '3'. There
>> might be more info in the other columns of that table, as in date
>> added and potentially removed.
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
>> > Ok, didn't go so well. Frustrating, the previous RC worked.
>> >
>> > Not sure whether to -1 or not.
>> >
>> > One of my hosts is in Disconnected mode and the logs show:
>> >
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,336 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Processing command:
>> com.cloud.agent.api.ReadyCommand
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,337 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null)
>> Startup task cancelled
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,337 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Not ready to connect to mgt server:
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Host 192.168.203.66 sent incorrect data
>> center: 1
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,337 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null)
>> Proccess agent startup answer, agent id = 0
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,337 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-2:null)
>> Set agent id 0
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,338 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> (AgentShutdownThread:null) Stopping the agent: Reason = sig.kill
>> > 2015-03-02 18:48:08,339 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
>> (AgentShutdownThread:null) Sending shutdown to management server
>> >
>> > My other host seems to run just fine; though it has no running VMs.
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Lucian
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >
>> > Nux!
>> > www.nux.ro
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> From: "Nux!" <n...@li.nux.ro>
>> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2015 17:41:39
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Testing time!
>> >>
>> >> EL6 OSS rpms here:
>> >> http://tmp.nux.ro/acs450/
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>> >>
>> >> Nux!
>> >> www.nux.ro
>> >>
>> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> >>> From: "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us>
>> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >>> Sent: Monday, 2 March, 2015 16:49:20
>> >>> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4
>> >>
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>> I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
>> >>> artifacts up for a vote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150302T1625
>> >>> Commit: c066f0455fa126a2b41cccefa25b56421a445d99
>> >>>
>> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> >>> location):
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc4/
>> >>>
>> >>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >>>
>> >>> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> >>>
>> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >>>
>> >>> [ ] +1  approve
>> >>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>> >> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>

Reply via email to