What's the QEMU and libvirt version?
 QEMU on CentOS 6.X does not support it.

2015-03-09 15:01 GMT+01:00 Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>:

> Because it doesnt work on my ACS 4.3 installation with CEPH :)
>
> I checked virsh dumpxml so only throtling on network level is present -
> unless it wasnt applied because of my qemu version (intank's patched
> versions of stocl 0.12.1.2, just RBD support added).
> qemu-kvm version problematic perhaps ?
>
> Was it supposed to work with 4.3 also, Wido ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On 9 March 2015 at 14:11, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >
> > On 03/09/2015 01:57 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if disk throtling on ACS44 or later works on shared
> > > storage (limiting number of IOPS and bandwtih, on compute
> > > offering)
> > >
> >
> > Why shouldn't it work? The throttling is done inside Qemu and works
> > just fine with NFS or Ceph.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > > I know this does NOT work (shared storage) on ACS 4.3, I'm
> > > wondering if it is there in 4.4/4/5 ?
> > >
> > > We are using KVM.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1
> >
> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU/ZvpAAoJEAGbWC3bPspCl0cP/0BuRCMcthp7ZHJho0hEFoWl
> > tZQ9k3OKtd6Y69wKbL8h6GuXlG/B4Wf1SM0QEM8yFSiO48YnoChmU4EZofSxZ4X5
> > 3Ah7oJAmvPuI6XoHziMafiAHz6V+91P7Lb8E72b2vz0cMW+uQDDDtaA77QCQWOUG
> > HTkZRqYnhAAIKy7y6gvom+e//uRMUMEFAcjxbTBrpRhvRPJN3Wf+nG65tCKwW4GH
> > fyaaVyKERW6Y3BHGRCYPPxfjLPBYvZAzfDx7PmtwrHfBrFMv+v1M30GPjN+dBzRs
> > 3TT+U970ALkcxlLWNLA+mvhA/kG6f9unYU5XyVTxzx4GonJYCRYzxchTV9b63OO9
> > 0p/UPaSuv8bgCQLlGpAxfEBzSjgvU28yNZg0UCesNmS41V9qdNRt0wzuV0uZzNKg
> > MsfRaGVTbR3VVysY8UYZCB/tz/5oFqtQzJMxQVmN/+Rigf8oxaI3aKHlfjlz1s+Y
> > 1o28b2S6U1QcfYWFZq91FLoWMoetq2SwgzmOy2JSwjGFy6lM55IqgrYvd1QuTEGp
> > IxZKf4PKm+pCGbKJIJ+kUJdPfUJCtSCjw8yiT7brsp5mFfjoe9kvKvRsa9Kdm1Ys
> > QqNMAjNkb9EWINqpqJYRlIwlGd/TT7QcH0t0kRjQuhuX1DPug2RghgyszHJzMsrW
> > UlEXVeoy8RjTnh8+hQXy
> > =+PhJ
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Andrija Panić
>

Reply via email to