-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2015 09:03 AM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Wido den Hollander > <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> >> On 03/10/2015 04:56 PM, David Nalley wrote: >>> So 4.5.0 has shipped - it's been propogated to hundreds of >>> mirrors, and undoing that is not trivial. IMO, we should patch, >>> and kick out another RC for 4.5.1 (or 4.5.0.1 I suppose) >>> >>> Version numbers are cheap to increment. >>> >> > >> But shall we stay away from building packages then? 4.5.0 will >> simply not be released in DEB or RPM format. >> >> > Is there anything that prevents us from releasing the 4.5.0 > packages with the patch? > > Technically not, but there won't be a matching source for the packages. And again, a Apache project only releases source, no packages. They are a community effort. Wido -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU//j2AAoJEAGbWC3bPspC4ekP/0+3VEpL82PPe3RX7vOZ0BnN bPXNXeKtAHk8xxoJmMb8LuVXd0reMsieYdYzSD647AtRyLfVc4gto+i4wbYzIJSV gMLYFR473fGtlXjl0iVI4WnZ6zhMaAei5rGzO8vCmxfhIYiEe+fpMIzMuLSRC1LM xaqCUVcSQuhjfze2ds5JnUIHKG1zEGoLBttjpizwxgc5OrVaI47oqn2QCeu0ojZO mN1TaEkqbJmj8FcOUnL+CLgr+WQX1m7CL256Vf/kJtQgSKJMP6Qw0v1fldfgf3vs q1xb+M19Peeqwnp5fQcfoWzHoAN9hUANOv1Pw9H5TDSs4VzHH1u7g/96lY5WKB0L aNDpyM1d0PtgYx7N8EmVIM0J+bQYjMIMCwitH5QmgGcDkWfHwD/1v03JnAK4Np5b +AajQmw+VYAhusn8+WvwHMfBQxSuxgAMqctpCf8CqmE7foz4LMDQcYCehQbVC+La 7bxmhIo1s726aSaPIwlyxbr+IUXL4QPc3GArPIvakAmn5iodqFfi7BDcWAdaO10b QewKfCTXUuDAql76F+QODLjjD4oNa2NRJsxT2v+CYZdmXgcxcuGcc6WPHfnECSMO A8J5OQyExTX1p1R+5VsRHvPxx0I3io66pXdDGw4QQmdjXtzFxP1ZaY4issLLnfr4 cvntN2Vn6QmsKDwcaA61 =iaWp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
