> -----Original Message-----
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 1:18 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
> 
> 
> On Apr 3, 2015, at 11:36 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> > <sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 3, 2015 1:57 PM
> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Stop using Review Board
> >>>
> >>> Seems with have lazy consensus.
> >>>
> >>> Will Stevens contributed CONTRIBUTING instructions at:
> >>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
> >>>
> >>> I am pushing that to 4.5,4.4 and 4.3 and I will update our website
> >>> contribution page, removing reference to RB.
> >>> I will then put a message in the RB current reviews.
> >>>
> >>> I propose to leave it a week with the message, this will give time
> >>> to folks to move their review to GH.
> >>>
> >>> After that, I will ask ASF infra to "hide" RB. They cannot make it
> >>> readonly, we can only hide the view.
> >>
> >> If RB is hidden, does that block us from seeing reviews of old patches on 
> >> it?
> >> Some of the commits doesn't have much meat in commit message, and in
> such cases used to go back to RB where we could get some information seeing
> review history/comments.
> >>
> >
> > All comments were copied to the mailing list.
> >
> > --David
> 
> I see your point Sateesh, but David is correct *you can search the mail 
> archive)
> and I also see no difference with normal commits made by committers. If the
> commit message is bad then tough luck.

Yeah, that helps. Thanks Sebastien, David. Would go through markmail list to 
dig more. 

Regards,
Sateesh
> 
> At least git blame tells you who changed the file the latest etc....and you 
> can
> always contact the committer who reviewed and applied that patch and should
> be familiar with it since he/she agreed to it.
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to