Thanks Rohit, This is not very reproductible. Out of 3 times I tried, 2 of the upgrades resulted in duplicated local storage pools.
I'll test some more today. Which patches exactly have you added? I am not sure I am supposed to test your packages at this point since it's essentially different code from what David cut ... -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rohit Yadav" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, 9 April, 2015 12:47:46 > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 > Hi Lucian, > > Can you share how we can reproduce the issue? I’m unable to simply reproduce > the > issue. I’ve though fixed two other issues. > > I’ve now rebuilt the repository with two recent fixes on top of 4.5.1 RC2: > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/ > > In case the local storage issue is environment related I suggest we continue > testing and report regressions/issues that need to be fixed before we have a > next RC3 voting thread. > >> On 08-Apr-2015, at 8:53 pm, Nux! <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> After upgrade from both 4.4.3 and 4.4.1 I ended up with the same local >> storage >> pool registered 2 times. >> >> Check the screenshot http://i.imgur.com/24Z2MXY.png that's the same server, >> the >> same local storage, listed 2 times, with different IDs. >> >> -- >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! >> >> Nux! >> www.nux.ro >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Mike Tutkowski" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wednesday, 8 April, 2015 15:43:31 >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc2 >> >>> I see the following GUI error when I delete a volume (although the delete >>> actually works): >>> >>> Unable to execute API command queryasyncjobresult due to invalid value. >>> Invalid parameter jobid value=undefined due to incorrect long value format, >>> or entity does not exist or due to incorrect parameter annotation for the >>> field in api cmd class. >>> >>> Is anyone else able to reproduce this? >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:58 AM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts >>>> up for a vote: >>>> >>>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>>> >>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150407T1726 >>>> Commit: 930d1fcba2abdb8229441fd0344518ca679f3d22 >>>> >>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>>> location): >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc2/ >>>> >>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c): >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>>> >>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>>> >>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 approve >>>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Mike Tutkowski* >>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* >>> e: [email protected] >>> o: 303.746.7302 >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud >>> <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > > Regards, > Rohit Yadav > Software Architect, ShapeBlue > M. +91 88 262 30892 | [email protected] > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab > > > > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services > > IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/> > CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> > CloudStack Software > Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/> > CloudStack Infrastructure > Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training > Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended > solely > for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions > expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent > those > of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient > of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor > copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have > received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in > England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in > India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil > Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by > The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. > ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
