black magic

Op do 21 mei 2015 om 17:16 schreef David Nalley <[email protected]>:

> Wow - you made quite a bit of progress there. :)
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > 1291 got magically reduced to 192 on refresh. :)
> >
> > Op do 21 mei 2015 om 09:11 schreef Daan Hoogland <
> [email protected]>:
> >
> >> There are five left :) they are all alike the one Laszlo fixed but as it
> >> concerned a string being cast into a map and the string may have
> different
> >> formats I made seperate tickets for them. I am next going to weed
> through
> >> the 1291 criticals, time permitting.
> >>
> >> Op wo 20 mei 2015 om 14:42 schreef Daan Hoogland <
> [email protected]
> >> >:
> >>
> >> thanks guys and girl,
> >>>
> >>> I saw you fixed a similar issue in the api Laszlo. I couldn't quite
> >>> translate it to the one I looked at. I will start creating issues for
> the
> >>> old ones. They are indeed mostly more then 3 years old.
> >>> Merged your pr, Rajani
> >>>
> >>> Op wo 20 mei 2015 om 13:51 schreef Rajani Karuturi <[email protected]
> >:
> >>>
> >>> I fixed js issues in https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/269
> >>>>
> >>>> ~Rajani
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Erik Weber <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Daan Hoogland <
> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > H fellow devs,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > It has come to my attentions that after more then eight months the
> >>>> sonar
> >>>> > > install at apache now does a daily analysis of cloudstack again.:)
> >>>> There
> >>>> > > are 26 issues stamped 'Blocker' and a lot more fun in the lower
> >>>> > categories.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > Shal I make issues per sonar 'Blocker'? I propose to make them
> >>>> critical
> >>>> > and
> >>>> > > not blocker.
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I guess the javascript ones could be put in a common issue, as they
> are
> >>>> > more or less similar.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Erik
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
>

Reply via email to