Hi Daan, Thanks for fixing and testing it! After DevOpsDays Ams I will also give it a go.
I can prepare a PR for the release notes and document the new setting. You can then merge it when the release passes. Or should we do this in another way? Regards, Remi > On 22 Jun 2015, at 16:35, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > tested specifically the blocker issue in a two host cluster with an > isolated network. > > both the option values false and true gave expected result on setting > router.reboot.when.outofband.migrated > > based on this behavior and the fact that setup worked smoothly > > +1 (binding) > > one point of attention is that a remark on this option should go in > the release notes. > > On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (1 mgr, 2 nodes, 1 nfs), advanced network fresh >> install, NFS storage, KVM, some tests on HA (crash vm/restore), SystemVM >> shape, some tests with templates, and CS<->cloud-init on debian. >> >> Tests on Ubuntu 14.04.2 (All-in-one ansible installation[1]), advanced >> network fresh installation >> >> Thanks for the RM. >> >> Milamber >> >> [1] https://github.com/milamberspace/ansible-cloudstack-ubuntu-aio >> >> >> >> On 18/06/2015 09:24, Daan Hoogland wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've created a 4.4.4 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: >>> >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4-RC20150618T1117 >>> Commit: 6f41061e1428527c3f826d268377557ce607196b >>> >>> List of changes: >>> >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/4.4.4 >>> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >>> location): >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.4/ >>> >>> PGP release keys (signed using 5AABEBEA): >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Daan
