On Nov 30, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Sebastien,
> 
> Can you confirm that users can expect to find the noredist build of the rpms 
> and debs at apt-get.eu ?
> 

I don't know

What I understood from Rohit, is that the "shapeblue" repo also contains pkgs 
that are hot-fixed and have features back ported.
In that sense it is quite a different repo than apt-get which only has pkg for 
each release.


> 
> 
>       
> Paul Angus
> VP Technology  ,       ShapeBlue Ltd
> s:    02036170528       |      t:     @cloudyangus      |      m:     +44 
> 7711418784
> e:    paul.an...@shapeblue.com          |      w:     www.shapeblue.com
>        53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HS. UK
> 
> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue 
> Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under 
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
> incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa 
> and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered 
> trademark.
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 30 November 2015 10:24
> To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Package Repositories
> 
> +1 all the way, sebastien
> 
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Nux! <n...@li.nux.ro> wrote:
> 
> > +1 your categories.
> >
> > Also +1 for the unified thing under cloudstack.apache.org domain.
> >
> > --
> > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >
> > Nux!
> > www.nux.ro
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "sebgoa" <run...@gmail.com>
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Sent: Monday, 30 November, 2015 10:08:59
> > > Subject: Re: Package Repositories
> >
> > > Hi folks, we need to resolve this.
> > >
> > > 1-But I have to start with one comment:
> > > Apache open office releases binaries, users don't compile from source.
> > So it is
> > > possible within ASF to officially release binaries.
> > >
> > > 2-We have several initiatives around repos, apt-get.eu (Wido),
> > shapeblue repos,
> > > Nux mirrors and image templates.
> > > Seems everyone agrees we need a tag team to coordinate all of it and
> > offer a
> > > unified front.
> > >
> > > 3-This unified front is great, but it won't happen this week, it
> > > will
> > take time
> > > and dedication.
> > >
> > > 4-The small issue we are facing is about 3 lines in an HTML file on
> > > our
> > website.
> > > Pierre-Luc and I had a chat Friday, in one of his comments on the PR
> > > he suggested that we list 3 categories:
> > >
> > > - source
> > > - community repo
> > > - 3-rd party repo
> > >
> > > I am +1 with this, why ?
> > >
> > > -source is a no brainer
> > > - community repo (apt-get) because that's our defacto pkg repo even
> > though we
> > > don't vote on packages. There was not vote to say these were our
> > community repo
> > > but that's a fact. Several people have access to the machine and can
> > > make updates etc...
> > > - 3rd party, allows us to list vendor pkg repo. The more vendors
> > > provide CloudStack the better. I see it a bit like the "books"
> > > discussions we had couple years ago. We do not endorse them, but we 
> > > should promote them.
> > >
> > > In our docs however, we should not be referencing 3rd party repos,
> > > and
> > any URLs
> > > should be cloudstack project specific.
> > >
> > > Can you please reply with your vote on these 3 categories. I think
> > > it's a compromise that helps us move forward.
> > >
> > > -sebastien
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 27, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > > <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Paul Angus
> > >> <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Doesn't that meant that we'll have to vote on the source and the
> > packaged
> > >>> rpms/debs otherwise they we have no official community standing. ?
> > >>>
> > >> ​I am not sure how we can give them official standing yet but we
> > >> are the apache foundation​, so we vote on source. I would say we
> > >> vote on the packaging software from a different repo then the
> > >> core+plugins and automatically update a repo from that one. The
> > >> repo will not be endorsed but the way it is filled will be.
> > >>
> > >> my €0,02 of future dreams
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > >>> Sent: 27 November 2015 09:36
> > >>> To: dev <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > >>> Subject: Re: Package Repositories
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Paul Angus
> > >>> <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> So. My understanding is that to make the packages in the repo
> > 'official'
> > >>>> they must be voted on. -- would we make the packages what we
> > >>>> vote on, rather that the source code (bearing in mind you can't 
> > >>>> separate the
> > >>>> packaging in that case). IMHO, it'll make testing a whole lot
> > simpler
> > >>> for
> > >>>> folks if there is just no requirement to build from source.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ​We will not stop voting on the source! Any vote on -, or
> > >>> otherwise handling of packages is a separate thing.​
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > > > Daan
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Daan
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Reply via email to