And that is what it should be ;) So untill then the qualification is being able to test PRs in abundance.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Remi Bergsma <rberg...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: > I don't think we need more RMs per se. I'd rather have more people testing > and reviewing the PRs. That will bring more velocity, not more RMs. > > Being RM now is a hell of a job because only a few people do reviews and > tests and I was crazy enough to compensate for that by testing many of them > myself. So, let more people do reviews and tests instead and the RM work > will be as boring as typing merge one-liners and sending vote mails. > > Regards, Remi > > > On 18 Dec 2015, at 10:40, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > H all, > > > > For 4.8 we need RMs. I will not continue with this job and if Remi does, > he > > shouldn't be on his own! > > > > Any committer that feels like it is needed and they are capable, please > > come forward. Of course, if you feel we can do without, please elaborate > on > > your views. I think this job can be shared amongst six people. > > > > regards, > > -- > > Daan > -- Daan
