This has been discussed rather intensively on the infra ML previously.

Here's an answer from David: http://markmail.org/message/msxi7bhkfijydckq

It's about half years old, so "short term" might have changed.

-- 
Erik

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Wido, you are touching on the point of governance there. The maintenance is
> the price for keeping the goods under your control. Apache wants to make
> sure force pushes are not garbage collected but tagged for audit purposes,
> I understand. Btw, let's include infra in the discussion.
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 08-01-16 09:25, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > > We, cloudstack-dev-list-users have been talking about moving more
> > > functionality to github. This is being rejected by the foundation so
> far
> > > for (in my view obvious) reasons of governance. The functionality is
> > > however missed dearly so speaking with an ex-member he suggested we
> > install
> > > a machine with gitlab under the apache domain and let it administer our
> > git
> > > repos to gain similar functionality. Is this being discussed already
> and
> > > should we do so?
> > >
> >
> > Well, it could be an idea to do I think. However, I think most people
> > prefer using Github since they use it daily.
> >
> > My problem with Gitlab is maintenance. Are we going to maintain it or
> > the Infra team?
> >
> > Wido
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Reply via email to