This has been discussed rather intensively on the infra ML previously. Here's an answer from David: http://markmail.org/message/msxi7bhkfijydckq
It's about half years old, so "short term" might have changed. -- Erik On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wido, you are touching on the point of governance there. The maintenance is > the price for keeping the goods under your control. Apache wants to make > sure force pushes are not garbage collected but tagged for audit purposes, > I understand. Btw, let's include infra in the discussion. > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote: > > > > > > > On 08-01-16 09:25, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > > We, cloudstack-dev-list-users have been talking about moving more > > > functionality to github. This is being rejected by the foundation so > far > > > for (in my view obvious) reasons of governance. The functionality is > > > however missed dearly so speaking with an ex-member he suggested we > > install > > > a machine with gitlab under the apache domain and let it administer our > > git > > > repos to gain similar functionality. Is this being discussed already > and > > > should we do so? > > > > > > > Well, it could be an idea to do I think. However, I think most people > > prefer using Github since they use it daily. > > > > My problem with Gitlab is maintenance. Are we going to maintain it or > > the Infra team? > > > > Wido > > > > > > -- > Daan >