Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1403#discussion_r62872442
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -172,78 +232,211 @@ private void validate(SnapshotInfo snapshotInfo) {
}
}
- private Void handleCreateTemplateFromSnapshot(SnapshotInfo
snapshotInfo, TemplateInfo templateInfo,
AsyncCompletionCallback<CopyCommandResult> callback) {
+ private boolean usingBackendSnapshotFor(SnapshotInfo snapshotInfo) {
+ String property = getProperty(snapshotInfo.getId(),
"takeSnapshot");
+
+ return Boolean.parseBoolean(property);
+ }
+
+ private void handleCreateTemplateFromSnapshot(SnapshotInfo
snapshotInfo, TemplateInfo templateInfo,
AsyncCompletionCallback<CopyCommandResult> callback) {
try {
snapshotInfo.processEvent(Event.CopyingRequested);
}
catch (Exception ex) {
throw new CloudRuntimeException("This snapshot is not
currently in a state where it can be used to create a template.");
}
- HostVO hostVO = getHost(snapshotInfo.getDataStore().getId());
- DataStore srcDataStore = snapshotInfo.getDataStore();
-
- String value =
_configDao.getValue(Config.PrimaryStorageDownloadWait.toString());
- int primaryStorageDownloadWait = NumbersUtil.parseInt(value,
Integer.parseInt(Config.PrimaryStorageDownloadWait.getDefaultValue()));
- CopyCommand copyCommand = new CopyCommand(snapshotInfo.getTO(),
templateInfo.getTO(), primaryStorageDownloadWait,
VirtualMachineManager.ExecuteInSequence.value());
+ HostVO hostVO = getHost(snapshotInfo);
- String errMsg = null;
+ boolean usingBackendSnapshot =
usingBackendSnapshotFor(snapshotInfo);
+ boolean computeClusterSupportsResign =
computeClusterSupportsResign(hostVO.getClusterId());
- CopyCmdAnswer copyCmdAnswer = null;
+ if (usingBackendSnapshot && !computeClusterSupportsResign) {
+ throw new CloudRuntimeException("Unable to locate an
applicable host with which to perform a resignature operation");
+ }
try {
- _volumeService.grantAccess(snapshotInfo, hostVO, srcDataStore);
+ if (usingBackendSnapshot) {
+ createVolumeFromSnapshot(hostVO, snapshotInfo, true);
+ }
- Map<String, String> srcDetails =
getSnapshotDetails(_storagePoolDao.findById(srcDataStore.getId()),
snapshotInfo);
+ DataStore srcDataStore = snapshotInfo.getDataStore();
- copyCommand.setOptions(srcDetails);
+ String value =
_configDao.getValue(Config.PrimaryStorageDownloadWait.toString());
+ int primaryStorageDownloadWait = NumbersUtil.parseInt(value,
Integer.parseInt(Config.PrimaryStorageDownloadWait.getDefaultValue()));
+ CopyCommand copyCommand = new
CopyCommand(snapshotInfo.getTO(), templateInfo.getTO(),
primaryStorageDownloadWait, VirtualMachineManager.ExecuteInSequence.value());
+
+ String errMsg = null;
+
+ CopyCmdAnswer copyCmdAnswer = null;
- copyCmdAnswer = (CopyCmdAnswer)_agentMgr.send(hostVO.getId(),
copyCommand);
- }
- catch (Exception ex) {
- throw new CloudRuntimeException(ex.getMessage());
- }
- finally {
try {
--- End diff --
I can not see what Rafael means. I think the code has changed since he made
the comment. I do see this method as growing out of proportion so some
refactorring for readability and maintainability seems in order.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
