> Op 16 mei 2016 om 18:16 schreef Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com>: > > > Hi All, > > As it looks like we're losing download.cloud.com and going to have to write > new database entries for all of the built-in templates, I think that it's > worth taking stock of the templates that we're using and trying to > consolidate them. > > CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) > > CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) > > CentOS 5.6(64-bit) no GUI (XenServer) > > CentOS 6.4(64-bit) GUI (Hyperv) > > CentOS 5.3(64-bit) no GUI (vSphere) > > CentOS 7(64-bit) no GUI (LXC) > > > I think we should pick one OS and version and have that available across all > hypervisors if possible. My criteria would be small, current, can support > user-data and password reset and is an OS *most* Linux people would be > comfortable with. >
So I would say Debian or CentOS? A Debian minimal install is very small and easy. But do we want to maintain a template as well? Isn't it easier to link somewhere? We at PCextreme build our templates using Packer btw, the source code is available here: https://github.com/PCextreme/packer-templates Wido > > > Thoughts? > > > > > Kind regards, > > Paul Angus > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > @shapeblue
