Can someone with a little more knowledge or access update Jira for this
ticket so that it links to the existing PR in some way? Should I just
put a comment in the ticket linking to it?
It seems, but correct me if I am wrong, that work on Strongswan has
stalled (last comment by original submitter was May 10th). Assuming that
is the case I am willing to pick it back up but would be very grateful
for any help people are willing to provide especially in interacting
with your testing rigs.
I succeeded in getting the dev environment setup and working to the
point where I can successfully build the systemvm images yesterday and
am reading through the testing info on the website today with the goal
of getting my local environment capable of running tests against my builds.
After reading through the PR comment thread my proposed plan is to use
that PR as a starting point but follow the advice in the thread by
moving to strongswan 5.x and altering the configs necessary to make that
switch. Once there, we see how NAT behaves and deal with the issues that
arise. Thoughts?
Thanks,
Matthew Smart
President
Smart Software Solutions Inc.
108 S Pierre St.
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: (605) 280-0383
Skype: msmart13
Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com
On 08/12/2016 07:22 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
We are also keeping an eye on the remote management VPN. Last time I've
tested the StrongSwan PR, it was not working for the remote MGT vpn,
site-to-site was working.
Look like some config would be missing in strongswan configuration. I'm
willing to test/provide configuration needed in strongswan.
I think it would be ideal to keep jira updated on for this issue since
multiple persons might work on it and also are impacted by it.
Cheers,
PL
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Smart <msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com>
wrote:
Thanks. Been years since I touched Jira/Confluence.
Matthew Smart
President
Smart Software Solutions Inc.
108 S Pierre St.
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: (605) 280-0383
Skype: msmart13
Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com
On 08/11/2016 01:50 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
Matthew,
If the PR has the jira issue in the PR subject, any updates to the PR
will be added to the Jira issue.
See this one for an example:
________________________________
From: Matthew Smart <msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:40 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-8682 StrongSwan
Thanks. I figured I was looking in the wrong place. For my future
reference did you just find this by searching strongswan in the git
repo? Is there any direct link between a Jira ticket and a git PR?
Matthew Smart
President
Smart Software Solutions Inc.
108 S Pierre St.
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: (605) 280-0383
Skype: msmart13
Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com
On 08/11/2016 12:15 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
Matthew,
There is an open PR for Strongswan here: https://github.com/apache/clou
dstack/pull/872
[https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3789214?v=3&s=400]<
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872>
Strongswan vpn feature by jayapalu · Pull Request #872 ·
apache/cloudstack<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872>
github.com
This features is replacing the openswan ipsec with strongswan ipsec.
There are template changes for this features and changes are included in
this PR as well. Tested the s2s vpn functionality usi...
[https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/3789214?v=3&s=400]<
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872>
Strongswan vpn feature by jayapalu · Pull Request #872 ·
apache/cloudstack<https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872>
github.com
This features is replacing the openswan ipsec with strongswan ipsec.
There are template changes for this features and changes are included in
this PR as well. Tested the s2s vpn functionality usi...
- Si
________________________________
From: Matthew Smart <msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:48 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CLOUDSTACK-8682 StrongSwan
Hey guys,
I have been banging my head against VPN for awhile now on 4.8.0. I am
testing on OSX which according to bug Cloudstack-7821 is a won't fix
until the Virtual Router is altered to use StronSwan instead of
OpenSwan. I am looking to make the auth system for VPN more
sophisticated but before I look into that it seems prudent to ensure
that the VPN is actually working on the platforms I intend to use.
So I have been looking at Cloudstack-8682 and the associated confluence
entry (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Repla
cing+openswan+ipsec+with+strongswan+ipsec
). Does anyone know if someone is actively working on this ticket? I
cannot locate any updates in Jira about it after August of 2015 (unless
I am missing something due to inexperience with Jira).
If someone is working on it I would like to know who so I can offer to
help. I will tackle this one if no one is working on it. Just need to
know so I know where to begin.
Thanks,
--
Matthew Smart
President
Smart Software Solutions Inc.
108 S Pierre St.
Pierre, SD 57501
Phone: (605) 280-0383
Skype: msmart13
Email: msm...@smartsoftwareinc.com
