> Op 23 december 2016 om 9:51 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> 
> 4.9.1.0 was voted recently but did not receive a lot of attention in terms of 
> testing/voting, and several users reports on the list and privately that they 
> would want to have XenServer7 support. I agree with Marty and other users 
> that it would be a great holiday present to release another minor 4.9.2.0 
> release that bundles few bugfixes and support for XenServer7.
> 
> 
> I'm planning to work towards 4.9.2.0 so as to at least cut 4.9.2.0-rc1 
> on/before 1st Jan, and currently working towards stabilizing 4.9.
> 

How big is the XS7 support patch? Technically, isn't that a feature?

I know very little about XS7 and I wouldn't be against. But when you talk about 
a Holiday present means you want to release it at least tomorrow? But you also 
say Jan 1st?

> 
> Given the current holiday period and to avoid competing voting threads -- if 
> there are no objections, I'm pushing the freeze date for 4.10/master to 30th 
> January? I would also like to invite anyone who wants to take over as RM for 
> the 4.10.0.0 release, thanks.
> 

No objections against that.

> 
> Master will be open to accept bugfixes and PRs that can be reviewed/merged. 
> There are several good PRs we can review/merge such as Wido's PR on ipv6 
> support for basic zone/network, and Jayapal's/Will's Strongswan VPN. I would 
> be willing to accept PRs that don't break any smoke tests on xen/vmware/kvm 
> (as covered by Travis, Trillian, BVT and others) and growing list of 
> component tests that have been added in Travis and some of which we've 
> started running in Trillian.
> 

I would really like #1700 and my additional Ipv6 stuff to be merged in to 4.10 
:)

Wido

> 
> Happy holidays.
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
>

Reply via email to