On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier <ma...@exoscale.ch> wrote: > > Daan, the project maintainers should enforce that. I also posted another > finding that the upgrade path are not identical due to the order in which > upgrade files are executed, see (https://github.com/apache/ > cloudstack/pull/1768)
If you mean refuse PRs containing non-idem-potent sql code yes, but as for real work it is all on a voluntary basis, that is someone must find it worth the time to encode it. I complete agree with a policy to refuse comntaining other creates and drop then as in > > "CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW..." "DROP IF EXISTS....". So please feel free to speak up if you catch somebody trying to sneak in code like that. They have my -1 -- Daan
