Hmm, it seems that there are people who would like to use it in ACS. However, by Simon`s email, the vendor does not seem to care much.
I am inclined to adopt one of Daan`s email previously: If we have to lay a burdon of fixing before release on people that > don't use it, I would say no. You use it, you maintain it. I am happy > to charge money to whoever wants to not maintain what they use. > Having said this, what do you guys think about removing this plugin from ACS? Then, we remove from our documentation the “MidoNet support”. Nowadays, I think we may bring expectation for people that may want to use it, and at the end of the day, ACS will not deliver it. Despite some people showing interest, this plugin does not work unless someone puts quite some effort into it. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Simon Weller <swel...@ena.com> wrote: > We took a look at testing it in the lab back in early 2016 and Midokura > told us that it was a bad idea, probably wouldn't work and we should just > switch to openstack. > > > - Si > > ________________________________ > From: Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 3:28 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: midonet-client and Guava dependency conflict > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Rafael Weingärtner > <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I got a reply from Midonet community; they said that midonet-client was > > incorporated by midonet-cluster ( > > https://github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster). > [https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/9136532?v=3&s=400]<https:// > github.com/midonet/midonet/tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster> > > midonet/midonet<https://github.com/midonet/midonet/ > tree/staging/v5.4/midonet-cluster> > github.com > midonet - MidoNet is an Open Source network virtualization system for > Openstack clouds > > > > > > > > > So, if anyone wants to invest energy on this, it might be a good idea to > > upgrade the dependency. Moreover, I start to question the compatibility > of > > the current client we are using, with the mido-net server side that might > > be deployed by users. Will this partial integration that we have work? > > > Just as important to ask: "Has it ever worked?" > Do we know anyone who use, or have used, this integration? > > -- > Erik > -- Rafael Weingärtner
