The plan looks great!
Thanks for the hard work Rohit.

Cheers,
Gabriel.

2017-11-29 11:21 GMT-02:00 Wei ZHOU <ustcweiz...@gmail.com>:

> Amazing Rohit !
> You did and will do nice job on the community. Thanks for all your work.
>
> -Wei
>
>
> 2017-11-29 11:14 GMT+01:00 Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I’d like to put myself forward as release manager for 4.11. The 4.11
> > releases will be the next major version LTS release since 4.9 and will be
> > supported for 20 months per the LTS manifesto [2] until 1 July 2019.
> >
> > Daan Hoogland and Paul Angus will assist during the process and all of us
> > will be the gatekeepers for reviewing/testing/merging the PRs, others
> will
> > be welcome to support as well.
> >
> > As a community member, I will try to help get PRs reviewed, tested and
> > merged (as would everyone else I hope) but with an RM hat on I would like
> > to see if we can make that role less inherently life-consuming and put
> the
> > onus back on the community to get stuff done.
> >
> > Here the plan:
> > 1. As RM I put forward the freeze date of the 8th of January 2018, hoping
> > for community approval.
> > 2. After the freeze date (8th Jan) until GA release, features will not be
> > allowed and fixes only as long as there are blocker issues outstanding.
> > Fixes for other issues will be individually judged on their merit and
> risk.
> > 3. RM will triage/report critical and blocker bugs for 4.11 [4] and
> > encourage people to get them fixed.
> > 4. RM will create RCs and start voting once blocker bugs are cleared and
> > baseline smoke test results are on par with previous 4.9.3.0/4.10.0.0
> > smoke
> > test results.
> > 5. RM will allocate at least a week for branch stabilization and testing.
> > At the earliest, on 15th January, RM will put 4.11.0.0-rc1 for voting
> from
> > the 4.11 branch, and master will be open to accepting new features.
> > 6. RM will repeat 3-5 as required. Voting/testing of -rc2, -rc3 and so on
> > will be created as required.
> > 7. Once vote passes - RM will continue with the release procedures [1].
> >
> > In conjunction with that, I also propose and put forward the date of 4.12
> > cut-off as 4 months [3] after GA release of 4.11 (so everyone knows when
> > the next one is coming hopefully giving peace of mind to those who have
> > features which would not make the proposed 4.11 cut off).
> >
> > I’d like the community (including myself and colleagues) to:
> > - Up to 8th January, community members try to review, test and merge as
> > many fixes as possible, while super-diligent to not de-stabilize the
> master
> > branch.
> > - Engage with gatekeepers to get your PRs reviewed, tested and merged
> > (currently myself, Daan and Paul, others are welcome to engage as well).
> Do
> > not merge the PRs
> > - A pull request may be reverted where the author(s) are not responding
> and
> > authors may be asked to re-submit their changes after taking suitable
> > remedies.
> > - Find automated method to show (at a glance) statuses of PRs with
> respect
> > to:
> >   · Number of LGTMs
> >   · Smoke tests
> >   · Functional tests
> >   · Travis tests passing
> >   · Mergeability
> > - Perform a weekly run of a component-test matrix against the master
> branch
> > before Jan 8th cut off (based on current hypervisors including basic
> (KVM)
> > and advanced networking).
> > - Continue to fix broken tests.
> >
> > Thoughts, feedback, comments?
> >
> > [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
> > Release+Procedure
> > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS
> > [3] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases
> > [4] The current list of blocker and critical bugs currently stands as per
> > the following list:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> > 3D%20CLOUDSTACK%20AND%20issuetype%20%3D%20Bug%20AND%
> > 20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%
> > 20Reopened)%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker%2C%20Critical)
> > %20AND%20affectedVersion%20in%20(4.10.0.0%2C%204.10.1.0%2C%
> > 204.11.0.0%2C%20Future)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%
> 20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
>

Reply via email to