Sure. Got it.

Will post update soon

2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>:

> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that
> it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late,
> but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads to a
> plethora of last minute PRs to include.
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
> igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/
> cloudstack/pull/2389
> > into 4.11
> > PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours.
> >
> > As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch.
> >
> > 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>
> :
> >
> > > +1 Daan
> > >
> > >
> > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com
> > > www.shapeblue.com
> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > @shapeblue
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Rohit, Ivan,
> > > >
> > > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can
> still
> > go
> > > > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at
> > Ivan's
> > > > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively
> > > > working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger
> > concern
> > > > is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are potentially
> > > > conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get the set
> list
> > > in
> > > > (and blockers).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> > > kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Rohit, Devs,
> > > >>
> > > >> just consider adding:
> > > >>
> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2362
> > > [resouce
> > > >> accounting blocker bug]
> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2350
> > > >> [security
> > > >> fix, enchancement]
> > > >>
> > > >> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final review*
> yet.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>:
> > > >>
> > > >>> All,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 Jan
> 2018)
> > we
> > > >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept critical/blocker
> > > fixes,
> > > >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 (est. by 15
> > Jan
> > > >>> 2018).
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to everyone as
> > there
> > > >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand authors
> have
> > > >> worked
> > > >>> hard to get them in.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Please share your thoughts, comments.  If you're the author of such
> > an
> > > >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding issues.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan is
> > > acceptable
> > > >>> to everyone. Thanks.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - Rohit
> > > >>>
> > > >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> > > >>> www.shapeblue.com
> > > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> > > >>> @shapeblue
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
> > > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
> > > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Daan
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Reply via email to