Sure. Got it. Will post update soon
2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>: > Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued that > it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably late, > but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads to a > plethora of last minute PRs to include. > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor < > igor.voloshane...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/ > cloudstack/pull/2389 > > into 4.11 > > PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours. > > > > As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch. > > > > 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> > : > > > > > +1 Daan > > > > > > > > > boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com > > > www.shapeblue.com > > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohit, Ivan, > > > > > > > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone can > still > > go > > > > in as long as active work on them continues. I have not looked at > > Ivan's > > > > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and he is actively > > > > working on it so why not include those in the milestone. A bigger > > concern > > > > is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone are potentially > > > > conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only to get the set > list > > > in > > > > (and blockers). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev < > > > kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Rohit, Devs, > > > >> > > > >> just consider adding: > > > >> > > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2362 > > > [resouce > > > >> accounting blocker bug] > > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2350 > > > >> [security > > > >> fix, enchancement] > > > >> > > > >> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but *no final review* > yet. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>: > > > >> > > > >>> All, > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by EOD today (8 Jan > 2018) > > we > > > >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept critical/blocker > > > fixes, > > > >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on 4.11 RC1 (est. by 15 > > Jan > > > >>> 2018). > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable to everyone as > > there > > > >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I understand authors > have > > > >> worked > > > >>> hard to get them in. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Please share your thoughts, comments. If you're the author of such > > an > > > >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding issues. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed that the plan is > > > acceptable > > > >>> to everyone. Thanks. > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> - Rohit > > > >>> > > > >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > > > >>> www.shapeblue.com > > > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > > > >>> @shapeblue > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev > > > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd. > > > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515 > > > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Daan > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Daan >
