Would you mind using Github issues instead of Jira? On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Frank Maximus < frank.maxi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote:
> I created CLOUDSTACK-10381 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10381> > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:10 PM Frank Maximus < > frank.maxi...@nuagenetworks.net> wrote: > > > I know that is the expected behavior. > > We stop the VM, do password reset, start the VM, check the config drive > > disk: no password file. > > When starting the VM, Cloudstack doesn't seem to remember the fact the > > password reset was executed. > > A strategy similar to what is done on VRElement in case VR isn't running > > might be needed. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Frank - wrt config drive, the reset password API would require the VM is > >> stopped. After VM is stopped, reset password and start the VM, the new > >> password should be put in the config drive iso: > >> > >> > >> http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.11/apis/ > resetPasswordForVirtualMachine.html > >> > >> zx > >> > >> > >> The previous implementation would not require vm to be stopped per ap, > >> and instead do a detach+update iso + attach operation which is > fail-prone > >> and may not work for all cases/VMs. > >> > >> > >> - Rohit > >> > >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Frank Maximus <frank.maxi...@nuagenetworks.net> > >> Sent: Monday, June 4, 2018 3:47:11 PM > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.1.0 LTS [RC1] > >> > >> -1. > >> > >> Reset password with ConfigDrive seems to broken. > >> The old password stays in use. > >> Will make a ticket soon. > >> Also the example scripts in setup/bindir need to be changed. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:26 AM Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > I checked three verification files, unpacked and build the code, and > am > >> > trusting the process otherwise: > >> > 0 (binding) > >> > The reason I am not giving a +1 is because the code presently does not > >> > build on anything but linux, due to the configdrive test not building > on > >> > macosx (and I presume windows) If we add that to release notes I am > fine > >> > with it. > >> > > >> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 5:27 AM, Tutkowski, Mike < > >> > mike.tutkow...@netapp.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 (binding) > >> > > > >> > > I created a new cloud using commit > >> > 5f48487dc62fd1decaabc4ab2a10f549d6c82400 > >> > > (RC1). I ran the automated regression tests for managed storage. All > >> > tests > >> > > passed. > >> > > > >> > > On 5/24/18, 9:56 AM, "Paul Angus" <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi All, > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I've created a 4.11.1.0 release (RC1), with the following > >> artefacts > >> > up > >> > > for testing and a vote: > >> > > > >> > > [NB we know there are issues for Nuage to sort in this RC, but > >> they > >> > > will be well contained, so let’s test everything else 😊 ] > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > >> > > > >> > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a= > >> > > shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.1.0-RC20180524T1000 > >> > > > >> > > Commit: 5f48487dc62fd1decaabc4ab2a10f549d6c82400 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the > same > >> > > > >> > > location): > >> > > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.1.0/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > PGP release keys (signed using 8B309F7251EE0BC8): > >> > > > >> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > The vote will be open till end of next week, 1st June 2018. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure > to > >> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > [ ] +1 approve > >> > > > >> > > [ ] +0 no opinion > >> > > > >> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Additional information: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > For users' convenience, I've built packages from > >> > > 5f48487dc62fd1decaabc4ab2a10f549d6c82400 and published RC1 > repository > >> > > here: > >> > > > >> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/4111rc1/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm > >> > > template upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the > following > >> > for > >> > > systemvm template upgrade testing: > >> > > > >> > > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack- > >> > > release-notes/en/latest/index.html > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > 4.11.1 systemvm templates are available from here: > >> > > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.11.1-rc1/ > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Kind regards, > >> > > > >> > > Paul Angus > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> > > @shapeblue > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Daan > >> > > >> > >> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- Rafael Weingärtner
