Hi Wido, I also very interested in similar deployment, especially combined with the capability of setting different network bandwidth for different networks, like 10.0.0.0/8 intra dc with 1g bandwidth per vm and white ipv4/ipv6 with regular bandwidth management. But it seem it takes very big redesign of VM settings and VR redesign is also required.
When I tried to investigate if it possible with ACS basic network, didn't succeed with any relevant information. пт, 8 июн. 2018 г., 14:56 Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>: > Hi, > > I am looking into supporting multiple Physical Networks inside onze > Basic Networking zone. > > First: The reason we use Basic Networking is the simplicity and the fact > that our (Juniper) routers can do the routing and not the VR. > > ALL our VMs have external IPv4/IPv6 addresses and we do not use NAT > anywhere. > > But right now a Hypervisor has a single VLAN/POD going to it terminated > on 'cloudbr0' using vlan://untagged. > > But to better utilize our physical hardware it would be great it Basic > Networking would support multiple physical networks using VLAN separation. > > For example: > > - PhysicalNetwork1: VLAN 100 > - PhysicalNetwork2: VLAN 101 > - PhysicalNetwork3: VLAN 102 > > I've been looking into DirectAttached with Advanced Networking, but I > couldn't find any reference to it on how that exactly works. > > Right now for our use-case Basic Networking with multiple Physical > Networks would work best for us. > > Has anybody looked at this or has any insight of the problems we might > run in to? > > Wido >
