+1 

Various customer related configurations and lifecycle operations, all looking 
good.

Environment:
- Mgmt: CentOS7.5
- HV: VMware 5.5
- Advanced zone

Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue

On 16/11/2018, 08:48, "Boris Stoyanov" <[email protected]> wrote:

    +1 
    
    I’ve did an upgrade all the way from 4.6 to rc5 and it was successful, I’ve 
also managed to run some basic lifecycle operation and it was looking good. 
    
    Regards, 
    Bobby.
    
    
    [email protected] 
    www.shapeblue.com
    Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
    @shapeblue
      
     
    
    
[email protected] 
www.shapeblue.com
Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On 15 Nov 2018, at 21:44, Gabriel Beims Bräscher <[email protected]> wrote:
    > 
    > +1 Deployed local environment and tested VM/host/storage lifecycles.
    > 
    > Hosts: KVM running on Ubuntu 16.04
    > Management server and database: running on Ubuntu 16.04
    > - create/use/delete system and user VMs
    > - register new template
    > - register service offering
    > - work with hosts (add, maintenance, remove)
    > 
    > Em qui, 15 de nov de 2018 às 03:21, Tutkowski, Mike <
    > [email protected]> escreveu:
    > 
    >> Thanks, Rohit!
    >> 
    >> 
    >> ________________________________
    >> From: Rohit Yadav <[email protected]>
    >> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:07 PM
    >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
    >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >> 
    >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
    >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
    >> safe.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Hi Mike, Paul, everyone,
    >> 
    >> 
    >> I tested the same on a 4.9.3.1 based VMware 5.5u3 + svs + basic zone and
    >> could see the same behaviour. Therefore, it's not a regression but a
    >> limitation from the past. Basic zone provides L3 isolation by means of
    >> security group (host-level firewall) which is not supported for VMware. I
    >> think nobody reported this in the past because nobody uses VMware+basic
    >> zone, I've opened an issue for this issue:
    >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3031
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Let's continue testing and voting for RC5, and let's aim to fix for this
    >> limitation in future 4.11.3+, 4.12.0+.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> - Rohit
    >> 
    >> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> ________________________________
    >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
    >> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2018 4:24:46 AM
    >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
    >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >> 
    >> I should note that I’m running vSphere 5.5, by the way. I believe that’s
    >> still supported in CS 4.11.
    >> 
    >> On 11/14/18, 3:52 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" <[email protected]> 
wrote:
    >> 
    >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
    >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
    >> safe.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> The VR doesn’t show as having an IP address.
    >> 
    >> On 11/14/18, 3:50 PM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
    >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
    >> safe.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Mgmt. server should ssh into VR.
    >> I'll fire a similar build in out lab.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> [email protected]
    >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >> @shapeblue
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
    >> Sent: 14 November 2018 22:41
    >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
    >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >> 
    >> Right, I’ve compiled and run with –Dnoredist. The SSVM and CPVM come up
    >> fine. They both show the VM and agent running. The VR boots up. I can see
    >> it at the login prompt in vSphere Client. I don’t see any obvious errors 
in
    >> cloud.log. Maybe a port is blocked and it can’t talk to the management
    >> server?
    >> 
    >> On 11/14/18, 3:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
    >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
    >> safe.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> I've tested in an ubuntu16 basic zone but not vmware basic zone - I guess
    >> that it goes without say that you know to use build nonoss from vmware...
    >> have you used the 6.5 sdk ?
    >> I think that it always says requires upgrade until the VR checks in.
    >> Have the SSVM and CPVM checked in ok? If you go on the VR through the
    >> vCenter console what do you see?
    >> 
    >> [email protected]
    >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >> @shapeblue
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Tutkowski, Mike <[email protected]>
    >> Sent: 14 November 2018 21:16
    >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
    >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.11.2.0 RC5
    >> 
    >> I’m having a hard time getting the VR with vSphere to come up 
successfully.
    >> 
    >> I built the code from source (the specified commit) and am using the
    >> system VM template specified in this e-mail chain.
    >> 
    >> I’m running in a Basic Zone. When I look at the details for the VR in the
    >> GUI, it says Requires Upgrade is Yes. When I click the button to upgrade
    >> the template, the operation fails.
    >> 
    >> Thoughts?
    >> 
    >> On 11/13/18, 6:59 AM, "Paul Angus" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> 
    >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or
    >> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
    >> safe.
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Hi All,
    >> 
    >> I've created a 4.11.2.0 release (RC5), with the following artefacts up 
for
    >> testing and a vote:
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Git Branch and Commit SH:
    >> 
    >> 
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.2.0-RC20181113T0924
    >> Commit: 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681
    >> 
    >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
    >> location):
    >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.2.0/
    >> 
    >> PGP release keys (signed using 51EE0BC8):
    >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
    >> 
    >> The vote will be open for 72 hours - until 14:00 GMT on Friday 16th Nov.
    >> 
    >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
    >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
    >> 
    >> [ ] +1 approve
    >> [ ] +0 no opinion
    >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
    >> 
    >> Additional information:
    >> 
    >> For users' convenience, I've built packages from
    >> 5aae410dfce2bef5cc21a0892370cb5d0628f681 and published RC5 repository 
here:
    >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/41120rc5/
    >> 
    >> The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvm template
    >> upgrade section has been updated.
    >> 
    >> 4.11.2.0 systemvm templates are available from here:
    >> http://packages.shapeblue.com/testing/systemvm/41120rc5/
    >> 
    >> Only the following changes have been added to RC5:
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
+-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >> | Version | Github | Type | Priority | Description |
    >> 
    >> 
+=========================+==========+===============+==========+============================================================+
    >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3018`_ | | | Prevent error on GroupAnswers on VR creation 
|
    >> 
    >> 
+-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3007`_ | | | Add missing ConfigDrive entries on existing
    >> zones after |
    >> | | | | | upgrade |
    >> 
    >> 
+-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#2980`_ | | | [4.11] Fix set initial reservation on public
    >> IP ranges |
    >> 
    >> 
+-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >> | 4.11.2.0 | `#3010`_ | | | Fix DirectNetworkGuru canHandle checks for
    >> lowercase |
    >> | | | | | isolation methods |
    >> 
    >> 
+-------------------------+----------+---------------+----------+------------------------------------------------------------+
    >> 
    >> .. _`#3012`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3012
    >> .. _`#3018`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3018
    >> .. _`#3007`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3007
    >> .. _`#2980`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2980
    >> .. _`#3010`: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3010
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> Kind regards,
    >> 
    >> Paul Angus
    >> 
    >> 
    >> [email protected]
    >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
    >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >> @shapeblue
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> [email protected]
    >> www.shapeblue.com
    >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK
    >> @shapeblue
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    >> 
    
    

Reply via email to