Hi Paul, ok I was not aware of that new feature. Is it wanted to support lb on sourceNAT IP has in your screenshot?
Le mer. 21 nov. 2018 03 h 27, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> a écrit : > Thanks @Pierre-Luc Dion and @jaya...@apache.org, > > My 'problem' is that being able to add an SSL cert to a VR loadbalancer > has appeared from nowhere in the 4.11 branch. (easiest explained with a > screen snip): > > https://imgur.com/a/r7zxA0b > > ... which led me to finding the assignCertToLoadBalancer API. > > I can't find a specific PR for it, or anything in the cwiki, and nothing > in our read-the-docs... > So I'm trying to find the author, so we can back fit some documentation, > rather than trying to reverse engineer it out of the code/trial and error. > > > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jayapal Uradi <jayapal.ur...@accelerite.com> > Sent: 21 November 2018 04:31 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: SSL offload in the VR > > What I remember is ssl offload feature added for netscaler and > assignCertToLoadBalancer API added during that time. > > -Jayapal > > > On 21-Nov-2018, at 5:06 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote: > > > > Hey Paul, I'm not aware the vr support ssl offload. What you are > > trying to achieve, there might be a work around. > > > > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 07 h 08, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> a > > écrit : > > > >> Apologies if my GitHub foo has abandoned me (it wouldn’t me the first > >> time); > >> > >> I searched for files which contained the API command > >> ‘assignCertToLoadBalancer’ and found ‘AssignCertToLoadBalancerCmd.java’ > >> > >> According to the history it was first committed as part of PR #2283 > >> “CLOUDSTACK-10105: Use maven standard project structure in all > >> projects” [1] > >> > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/1d05fead49f5c856257a741b > >> 07122f5633d2e359/api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/ > >> user/loadbalancer/AssignCertToLoadBalancerCmd.java > >> > >> again, sorry if I’ve misread or misinterpreted the history… > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Paul Angus > >> > >> From: Marc-Aurèle Brothier <m...@brothier.org> > >> Sent: 20 November 2018 11:23 > >> To: Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > >> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: SSL offload in the VR > >> > >> Hi Paul, > >> > >> What made you think so? I haven’t pushed any change related to the > >> VR. At Exoscale, we removed the VR entirely instead and moved the > >> services down at the HV level. > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Marc-Aurèle > >> > >> > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com > >> www.shapeblue.com > >> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> On 20 Nov 2018, at 09:04, Paul Angus <paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto: > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > >> Hi Marc-Aurèle, > >> > >> As far as I can tell, I believe that you added the ability to upload > >> an SSL certificate to the VR in 4.11 I can’t find any user > >> documentation for it in our Wiki or the in read-the-docs. > >> I guess it’s something that you use at Exoscale, could you do a pull > >> request to cloudstack-documentation or forward me some documentation > >> which I can then add to the users documentation. > >> > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> > >> Paul Angus > >> > >> > >> paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com> > >> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > >> @shapeblue > >> > >> > >> > >> > > DISCLAIMER > ========== > This e-mail may contain privileged and confidential information which is > the property of Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business. It is intended > only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If > you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, retain, > copy, print, distribute or use this message. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify the sender and delete all copies of > this message. Accelerite, a Persistent Systems business does not accept any > liability for virus infected mails. >