Thanks for following up on this Rohit. On Thu., Apr. 15, 2021, 4:53 a.m. Rohit Yadav, <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi All, > > Update - Peter and I had a call with Chris from Hashicorp to discuss the > issue. They've agreed to relicense their terraform provider codebase to > Apache License v2.0, following which we should be able to continue any > further development, maintenance, and releases by the Apache CloudStack > project much like the kubernetes provider codebase. > > I'll start a vote thread on the same shortly. > > > Regards. > > ________________________________ > From: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 14:52 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; > us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider > > Hi Peter, > > I had explored the migration of repo, but before we do that we need to get > the original authors to relicense the codebase to Apache License v2.0. I'll > discuss this with Hashicorp authors and report back soon. > > > Regards. > > ________________________________ > From: peter.murysh...@zv.fraunhofer.de <peter.murysh...@zv.fraunhofer.de> > Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 21:04 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; > us...@cloudstack.apache.org <us...@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: AW: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider > > Hi all, > > are there any updates regarding this topic i.e. migration of HashiCorp > Terraform provider to Apache CloudStack, either registering it in > HashiCorp's registry? > > kind regards > Peter > ________________________________________ > Von: Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Januar 2021 17:14:05 > An: Will Stevens; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users; Niclas Lindblom; Pierre-Luc Dion > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider > > Hi Wido, Will, PL, all, > > I think I can setup a repository and request ASF infra (who prefers a JIRA > ticket) to enable PR/issue on it, anybody has an objection to a new > apache/cloudstack-terraform repo to maintain the provider plugin? > > > Regards. > > ________________________________ > From: Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com> > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 19:49 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Cc: users <us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Rohit Yadav < > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>; Niclas Lindblom <niclas_lindb...@icloud.com>; > Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloud.ca> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider > > Hey PLD, > You may want to tune into this. I think you may be maintaining a fork > based on this code, but I am not positive. > > On Fri., Jan. 29, 2021, 6:07 a.m. Wido den Hollander, <w...@widodh.nl > <mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: > > > On 28/01/2021 10:55, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Agree we can ask that. > > > > Is infra from ASF the place to ask this? > > Wido > > > > > Regards. > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl<mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 15:35 > > To: Niclas Lindblom <niclas_lindb...@icloud.com<mailto: > niclas_lindb...@icloud.com>>; us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto: > us...@cloudstack.apache.org> <us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto: > us...@cloudstack.apache.org>> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org> < > dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider > > > > > > > > On 1/27/21 12:18 AM, Niclas Lindblom wrote: > >> I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already > installed, since it was archived it no longer automatically downloads when > applying unless manually installed. > >> > >> From the Hashicorp website, it appears it was archived when they moved > all plugins to their registry and needs an owner and an email to Hashicorp > to be moved into to the registry and supported again when running > Terraform. I use it regularly but haven’t got the technical skills to > maintain the code so been hoping this would be resolved. > >> > > > > I mailed Hashicorp to ask about this: > > > > "Thanks for reaching out. The provider was archived because we launched > > the Terraform Registry last year which allows vendors to host and > > publish their own providers. We'd be happy to work with you to transfer > > the repository over to a CloudStack Github organization where you can > > build and publish releases to the registry. > > > > We'd also like to have CloudStack join our Technology partnership > > program so I can mark your Terraform provider as verified." > > > > So I think we don't need to do much technology-wise. > > > > I don't use Terraform and don't have a major stake in it, but I would > > hate to see the Provider being removed from Terraform. > > > > Should we request https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform at > > infra and then host the Provider there? > > > > Wido > > > >> Niclas > >> > >> > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> > > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > > @shapeblue > > > > > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > @shapeblue > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > @shapeblue > > > > > rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > @shapeblue > > > > > On 26 Jan 2021, at 18:33, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de<mailto: > christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 26. Jan 2021, at 10:45, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl<mailto: > w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 1/26/21 10:40 AM, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de<mailto: > christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de> wrote: > >>>>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar < > abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com<mailto:abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here > https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is anyone using or maintaining it? > >>>>> > >>>>> We are also using it heavily and are somewhat worried about the > module being archived. > >>>> > >>>> Agreed. But do we know why this has been done? What needs to be done > to > >>>> un-archive it? > >>>> > >>>> If it's just a matter of some love and attention we can maybe arrange > >>>> something. > >>>> > >>>> Is it technically broken or just abandoned? > >>> > >>> This is just an educated guess, but given that we're not experiencing > any technical issues, I believe it has just been abandoned. > >>> > >>> Christian > >>> > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Wido > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module ( > https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/scenario_guides/guide_cloudstack.html) > but are there any other alternatives of Terraform that you may be using > with CloudStack? > >>>>> > >>>>> The ansible module is working quite well. However, one of the > advantage of terraform imho is that one can easily destroy defined > infrastructure with one command, while with ansible 'the destrcution' needs > to be implemented in the playbook. Another advantage is that (at least) > Gitlab can now maintain terraform states, which quite nicely supports > GitOps approaches. > >>>>> > >>>>> Cheers, Christian > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Abhishek > >>>>>> > >>>>>> abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com<mailto:abhishek.ku...@shapeblue.com> > >>>>>> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>< > http://www.shapeblue.com> > >>>>>> 3 London Bridge Street, 3rd floor, News Building, London SE1 9SGUK > >>>>>> @shapeblue > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >> > > >
