Sylvain Wallez wrote: <snip>
Names are one of the most important things in design, since it's first through the names that a user goes into a set of classes. Bad names imply wrong understanding. Abstractions named after a particular implementation make other implementations look clumsy, since they don't fit into the name, even if they fit into the real underlying concept.
Fine. Would you mind demonstrating at least one alternative implementation of "FlowEngine" and "FlowController" so that the rest of us can make a technical assessement of how well it "fits" if you intend to make these name changes?
Even so, I really don't like your names. <map:call> made perfect sense when calling a continuation or function (since they are actually callable). I don't quite get what "calling" a "state" means.
Chris
