From: Marc Portier > > Reinhard Pötz wrote: > > JXForms is very close to the XForms standard by the W3C. > The problem > > with this standard is that is was written for clients and not for > > servers. > > > > I share this view... > > > On the other hand Woody is IMO a server-side form framework > with the > > possiblity to reuse parts. The key is that Woody uses widgets and > > widgets needn't be fields. So you could write a calendar widget and > > reuse it everywhere. > > that is the idea, but some way to go yet > > > Currently Woody is missing a connection to your data models. Marc > > already wrote RT on this topic but I have to admit that I > haven't had > > the time to answer on them and IMO Woody needs the > *possiblity* (not a > > must) > > > > yep, that is my believe to > > woody is already used by (some courageous) people that just > programmatically interact with the widgets (set/getValue on them) > directly, this is a use case that should be sustained at all > times IMHO > > the idea I had, and wanted to discuss about is making sure that > we can off-load (and make declarative) this programmatic > interaction to what I dubbed a 'Binding Manager' > > what it boils down to is (like the form-manager in woody) a > factory for 'Binding' objects... these objects: > - are instantiated by the factory based on a declarative XML file > - have two public methods loadFormFromModel(form, model) and > saveFormToModel(form, model) > > given the limited interaction in the list
Expect more after 2.1 is released! Then we should find a path from JXForms -------\ \ Cocoon / Form Framework Woody -------/ > about this I have just > been playing some more with the idea and have a JXPath based > implementation on my HD: I'm cleaning it up as we speak to be in > a postable format on bugzilla... (which will include a sample for > editing an XML file, given the JXPath implementation though it > should be fairly easy to use it for hibernate produced javabeans > as well) Yes, IMO JXPath support for the data model is a must > > I promised this before, but it looks like I should be able to get > it out today (sorry for the implied suspense :-)) > (in fact: bruno just looks to this over my shoulder and starts > laughing: "Marc is making guestimates again" DUH!) > > > > to plug-in a global data dictionary (greetings from SAP ;-) > > > > don't know SAP, however your remark makes me think about all sort > of things (not uncommon for me) > > however in this case I'ld rather have you explain more closely > what you envision... Expect more in August (after my holidays) > > > As you can see the frameworks are different and designed with > > different goals. I'm not sure how those can be combined but I'm > > expecting Sylvains RTs > > (http://www.anyware-tech.com/blogs/sylvain/archives/000060.html) > me too, it is not the first time Sylvain mentioned this As Antonio pointed out sometime in the future there may exist clients that support XForms natively and we shouldn't forget this .. > wishing him the rest of mind the Alps could give him to pull this > off :-) me too ;-) Reinhard