On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:04, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > While reviewing the file formats, I was wondering... > > Currently, Woody uses the "id" attribute everywhere for identifiers be > there on a defining element (e.g. <wd:field>) or a referring element > (e.g. <wi:widget>). > > Now that we will start to mix namespaces and have format & datatype > dictionaries referred to by other files, it seems to me cleaner and more > understandable to differentiate defining and referring attribute. > > For this, I propose to keep the current "id" on defining elements and > use "ref" attribute on referring elements. > > Thoughts ? Is it nitpicking ?
No, ref is better. -- Bruno Dumon http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
