Stephan Michels wrote: > At least, we should agree on one name > > SourceHierarchyGenerator -> http://apache.org/cocoon/hierachy/1.0 > SourceCollectionGenerator -> http://apache.org/cocoon/collection/1.0 > SourceDirectoryGenerator -> http://apache.org/cocoon/directory/1.0 > > or DirectoryGenerator.
Probably I should shut up and sit down before adding yet another opinion but FWIW I prefer DirectoryGenerator. It's most user-friendly (immediately understood by everyone) and compatible. I can already imagine: "What the heck is SourceHierarchyGenerator" "A DirectoryGenerator for other sources as well" :-) I see no strong reason to rename DirectoryGenerator just because now it operates on other sources as well. It is semantically as correct as the other. The next step is renaming FileGenerator? Although this would even make more sense. But given that these components will mostly be used for the filesystem for a long time to come ... But I'm fine with any of these names. Guido
