Hi J�rg, I also have problems with my Apache mails and I asked [EMAIL PROTECTED] some days ago similar questions. Brian Behlendorf responded:
"...for some reason, mail destined for gmx.net frequently goes for days without being deliverable. I can't tell you why, only the gmx.net admins can. If a message can not be delivered for 3 days, it is bounced; so now that (if!) gmx.net mail is working, you will probably get messages from mailing lists you were on either probing to see if the account is still bouncing, or letting you know you were removed (though those messages may have bounced as well). I would strongly recommend that you choose some other mail provider. In the past I have added gmx.net to the list of domains to bounce immediately in an attempt to clean up the delivery queue a bit; I'll try not to do that next time." HTH Cheers, Reinhard > -----Original Message----- > From: Joerg Heinicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 4:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [OT] getting no mails from Apache (again) > > > Hello, > > it's now the second time that I don't get any mail from > Apache, though > I'm subscribed to several lists. Because I'm not the only one > using GMX > I wanted to ask if anybody else has problems receiving Apache mails. > They simply seem to stop without any particular reason - and the last > time after some weeks I got the mails again, also without any reason. > It's not a problem of subscribing, the mails simply don't > come through > from Apache to GMX. After the outage the last time I got big > mails from > Apache mailing software ezmlm that it could not deliver the > mails with > "host not found" or something similar. But I don't want to take my > Apache address (I have now resubscribed with it for receiving > the mails) > for writing mails as long as I can not use my Mozilla mail > for it. I'm > not that shortcut junkie, that likes to use pine ... > > One of the last mails I got yesterday is 54342 at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I didn't receive my own reply on > this mail 54346. (Maybe this helps for finding out the reason.) > > Joerg >
