Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Phil Shafer wrote: > > >Vadim Gritsenko writes: > > > > > >>Try the suggestion above. > >> > >> > > > >Will do. Thanks for the help. Is there a PR open for this? Should > >I open one? > > > > I think there is no bug open for this. Also, I'd ping Carsten to hear > his opinion. Carsten? > > PS Thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=106067513100007&r=1&w=2 > Pong.
I think this is something the internal processing should handle, which means, if the reader sets such a header it should simply be ignored instead of being passed on. Now, I guess this is very easy as we could create a response wrapper for internal requests (we already have a request wrapper) and filter the headers. Carsten
