On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:27:30PM +0200, Christian Geisert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> >jefft 2003/08/31 02:41:53
> >
> > Modified: etc/cocoon_upgrade upgrade_cocoon_jars.sh
> > Log:
> > Don't upgrade FOP, as 0.20.5 seems to have a JAI dependency hardcoded
>
> Huh?
> FOP 0.20.5 is build with JAI and Jimi support but the runtime usage is
> dynamic which means if JAI is not available then Jimi is used.
It looks like Cocoon's src/blocks/fop/lib/fop-0.20.5.jar was compiled with only
JAI support. It goes bang when trying to render images with Jimi or when
neither Jimi nor JAI is present:
...
* [0] community/index.pdf
* [0] skin/images/menu-left.gif
* [0] images/remove.jpg
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
com/sun/media/jai/codec/FileCacheSeekableStream
at org.apache.fop.image.JAIImage.loadImage(JAIImage.java:95)
at org.apache.fop.image.AbstractFopImage.getBitmaps(AbstractFopImage.java:281)
at org.apache.fop.pdf.PDFXObject.output(PDFXObject.java:233)
at org.apache.fop.pdf.PDFDocument.output(PDFDocument.java:1296)
at org.apache.fop.render.pdf.PDFRenderer.render(PDFRenderer.java:888)
at org.apache.fop.apps.StreamRenderer.queuePage(StreamRenderer.java:302)
at org.apache.fop.layout.AreaTree.addPage(AreaTree.java:108)
at org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.makePage(PageSequence.java:415)
at org.apache.fop.fo.pagination.PageSequence.format(PageSequence.java:338)
at org.apache.fop.apps.StreamRenderer.render(StreamRenderer.java:262)
at org.apache.fop.fo.FOTreeBuilder.endElement(FOTreeBuilder.java:223)
at org.apache.cocoon.xml.AbstractXMLPipe.endElement(AbstractXMLPipe.java:147)
at org.apache.cocoon.xml.AbstractXMLPipe.endElement(AbstractXMLPipe.java:147)
Replacing Cocoon's fop-0.20.5.jar with that from the FOP distribution fixes the
problem.
The CVS log for Cocoon's FOP jar says:
----------------------------
revision 1.3
date: 2003/08/21 01:57:42; author: joerg; state: Exp; lines: +4888 -4746
after update to batik 1.5 rebuild of fop 0.20.5
----------------------------
I'm not sure what this means. Batik doesn't use FOP does it? Is it safe for
me to commit the FOP 0.20.5 jar to Cocoon?
--Jeff
> Christian
>
