Back from holidays ... having more than 2200 mails (not only Cocoon) in 11 days ... started with CVS mails, so ignore my question if it sounds stupid:

Isn't this now handled by the dependency in the gump descriptor? At least I read something about library dependency on blocks (portal vs. html). So do we need this comments in the properties files? Especially for FOP it's only a dependency on the batik library.

Joerg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

bdelacretaz 2003/09/05 08:31:36

Modified: . blocks.properties
Log:
dependency comments added (from the BlockDescriptions wiki page)
Revision Changes Path
1.28 +11 -1 cocoon-2.1/blocks.properties
Index: blocks.properties
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/cocoon-2.1/blocks.properties,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -r1.27 -r1.28
--- blocks.properties 4 Sep 2003 12:42:43 -0000 1.27
+++ blocks.properties 5 Sep 2003 15:31:36 -0000 1.28
@@ -9,6 +9,10 @@
# 'local.blocks.properties' and modify that. The build system will override
# these properties with the ones in the 'local.blocks.properties' file.
+# NOTE: "dependency" indicates blocks that are required by other blocks.
+# disabling batik, for example, will prevent fop from compiling
+
+
# Stable blocks ----------------------------------------------------------------
# stable blocks are those that can be considered ready for production and
@@ -17,6 +21,8 @@
# depend on.
#exclude.block.authentication-fw=true
+
+#dependency: fop needs batik
#exclude.block.batik=true
#exclude.block.bsf=true
#exclude.block.chaperon=true
@@ -37,6 +43,8 @@
#exclude.block.portal-fw=true
#exclude.block.profiler=true
#exclude.block.python=true
+
+#dependency: authentication-fw needs session-fw
#exclude.block.session-fw=true
#exclude.block.slide=true
#exclude.block.swf=true
@@ -58,6 +66,8 @@
#exclude.block.apples=true
#exclude.block.asciiart=true
#exclude.block.axis=true
+
+#dependency: scratchpad needs cron
#exclude.block.cron=true
#exclude.block.eventcache=true
#exclude.block.linotype=true

Reply via email to