On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:21:35 +0200, Ugo Cei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Stages 3 � 5 are similar to those carried out in XSP. > >Having been an XSP user until recently (thank god we now have the Flow >and JXTemplateGenerator, or VelocityGenerator if you prefer), I'd rather >use dynamic proxies over generated and compiled code any time. The >edit/test/debug cycle is much faster, error messages are less cryptic, >no dependency on tools.jar, no 64kB-per-method limit, no continuous >reloading of classes which stresses appservers (by the way, I've yet to >understand how to configure Jetty for automatic class reloading, if it's >possible at all), etc. > >However, if the problem with complex types is unsurmountable (I have >exactly zero knowledge about Axis), I think we can live with generated code. I understand and share your conserns. I don't think the problems with dynamic proxies represent a brick wall, I just think it will be easier to start with the generated + compiled approch first. We can add the dynamic proxies later and work on the complex type problems. It would be nice to offer the user a choice. Luke
