----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 8:34 PM Subject: Re: on better release and version management
<snip/> > > <side-note> > Eventually it would be helpful for the source website to include the static > meta-info, live meta-info, and some pretty, graphical data from some community > data miners like Agora, etc. to help evaluate the liveliness of a module and > its developer and user communities. This could even be used by the developers > to help track what is used, what is causing problems, what can be retired, etc. > </side-note> A little bit like the "Activity Percentile" used by SourceForge ? That would help to prevent a lot of mistakes and confusion! Which solution should I select : Woody or JXForms? FOP or iText? Just look at the activity to determine the health of a module/block. I consider myself an experienced user, but whenever I'm looking at doing something new with Cocoon -- and there are two alternatives available -- I'm "scared" that I pick the unsupported/dead/obsolete alternative instead of the one with the ongoing active development. (Can you say "Murphy" ?) > > --Tim Larson > Litrik De Roy www.litrik.com
