From: Sylvain Wallez > >>This would handle the use cases where a variable's value > should not be > >>shared between continuations : when the value is fetched, > crawl up the continuation tree up to a point where a value > exists, and when the value is set, attach it only to the > forthcoming continuation (not to the latest one, as it may be > the root of a continuation subtree). > >> > >> > > > >Sounds good! This would be the feature Francis is asking > for, wouldn't > >it? > > > > > > Yes, and it would allow to "pay the cost" for this behaviour > only when > it's really needed.
Do you already have an idea how to implement this? This means digging into rhino-continuations, doesn't it? Reinhard
