Giacomo Pati wrote: > > But first we need to come to a consensus about which build > infrastructure we would support to use: > > 1) Ant > in this case we can use the current build system and tune it to the > needs we have for the 2.2 and maybe add some ruper task to get rid > of jars in our repository (suggested by Nicola Ken IIRC) and some > more for modularisation ease > > 2) Centipede > in this case I could not volunteer as I'm out of Centipede since > their move from Cents to Antlibs (we still have some customer > project using a Cents based version of it but they will never move > to Antlibs) > > 3) Maven > ATM this is my preferred build infrastructure and I could help > building the 2.2 repo based on it > > Please show your preferences (if you don't have a clue about Maven > and/or Centipede have a look at their sites at http://maven.apache.org > and http://www.krysalis.org/centipede/ respectively) > Currently I prefer Maven as it is already used by many other Apache projects.
Carsten
