Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > <SNIP> > > No matter what the result was, I think forcing people with one solution > forced discussions to happen, which helped all the parties involved, > even to understand thing that were not previously understood by both > sides. > > This is why having one official direction on the various areas is > good(tm) and having a simple name for it "cocoon sitemap" "cocoon flow" > "cocoon forms" would help our users to choose and feel more protected > and a more solid foundation. > +1
In some areas we have two or three (or more) different solutions all not satisfying the real users needs which is really crap. So, I consider this one of the most important discussions at the GT and the result might be the most important one. Carsten
