Joerg Heinicke wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I think there was agreement on Monday about this, do we need a vote, or am I mistaken about the agreement?
Someone mentioned that "Forms" in the name is "to official" and Stefano answered "if we won't have forms in the name we don't need to rename it at all". Such a nice toy name :) But I have no problem with renaming it.
Naming it "Cocoon Forms" is a nice parallel to "Cocoon Flow", and shows that we're betting the farm on it, which I like.
+1
+1
We can probably keep Woody as the block name though, in homage to the great sandwiches delivered to the great original authors of Cocoon Forms ;-)
-1 either "Woody" or "Cocoon Forms", not a mixture
yes, same feeling here
however I do like the idea of holding on to some historic-faits-dhiver-reference by adding a cocoon forms sample that shows how to use it for building a sandwich-lunch-ordering application :-)
actually we should change namespaces too, and the used prefixes
as well as some classnames,
and some stuff in the samples, possible references from other blocks, the (wiki) docos,...
any feelings around this?
regards, -marc= -- Marc Portier http://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog at http://radio.weblogs.com/0116284/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
