Stefano: > No and the fact that we started with implementing xforms shows it > pretty well.
I think you missed the smiley on my last line. ;-) > The XForms standard is a client-side technology. There *is* a block > that implements form handling in cocoon, but we moved away from it > because of its design limitations on the server side. That is not entirely correct. Though XForms can be implemented through a client-side user interface, it is also intended to be used with XHTML/WML and other forms of markup and given the slow progress in browser extensions, presumes the availability of server side solutions as well. > Simply put, Xforms was designed as a client side technology, and we > support it that way. (just like we do with cinclude and xinclude where > cinclude is for the server side and xinclude is left for the client > side) I'll check the archives for other discussions on this topic, to understand the decision that was taken with regards to Cocoon. In the meantime, I'll stick to Chiba for my standards-based form processing. ;-) Andrzej Jan Taramina Chaeron Corporation: Enterprise System Solutions http://www.chaeron.com
